The check

Show us what the AI produced.

Your team drafts a quarterly client letter with an assistant. It reads well. Below is what Provenact returns when you give it that draft and the approved sources it was meant to rest on.

Draft · Q3 client letter Fictional demo data

The Fund returned 8.4% over the quarter, ahead of its benchmark. Our overweight position in UK mid-caps drove the majority of this outperformance, and we expect this to continue into the coming year. Covenant exposure remains within the limits set out in the mandate. The valuation of the unlisted holding was confirmed by an independent third party in March.

Carried by an exact source span
Unsupported
Contradicted by a deterministic check
Stale
What needs you 3 of 5 claims
Unsupported “we expect this to continue into the coming year” A forward-looking statement with no approved basis in the connected sources. Your communications procedure requires one, or a balanced risk warning alongside it. Rule 4 · Communications procedure v2.1
Contradicted “Covenant exposure remains within the limits” The rules engine computed exposure at 53% against an approved limit of 50%. This is arithmetic from admitted evidence, not a model's opinion. Rule 2 · Mandate v5.0 §4.3 · holdings snapshot
Stale “confirmed by an independent third party in March” The most recent valuation Provenact can see is dated 14 months before this letter. The claim may still be true; we cannot evidence it from what is connected. Valuation file · last modified 12 Jul 2025
Who may approve this A breach exception on this mandate is reserved to the Head of Investment Risk. The current operator holds preparation authority only. Nothing is sent. Nothing self-activates. Provenact has prepared a correction and routed the decision.

The reviewer stops rebuilding the basis and starts reading the exceptions.

That is the whole saving. Today a reviewer who receives an AI-prepared letter is the first person to have looked at it properly — so they reconstruct its basis by hand, one claim at a time, before their name goes near it.

Provenact does the reconstruction. The person does the judgement, on the three things that actually need it.

This is the same 53%-against-50% breach recorded in the hosted run on the receipt page — one illustrative letter, one real reviewed record, deliberately showing the same case from both ends. Worked example built on a fictional reference fixture. Provenact does not provide investment advice and asserts no valuation. No customer result is claimed.

Request a working session

P. Every act, proven